Latest Posts

An Index Card, Feedback, and Better Tennis: A Simple Daily Reflection Habit Habit Stacking: A Simple Productivity Habit That Can Improve Your Tennis Killer Doubles: Strategies and tactics for better tennis Take Two: Principle 12’s Second-Serve Exception A 5-Minute Desk Workout for Tennis Players Tennis Beyond the Headlines: July 27, 2026 2027 USTA League Regulations: Rethinking NTRP Grievances

Two Serves or Not Two Serves, That is the Question

In the “History of the Service Let” we discussed that there really isn’t a satisfactory reason recorded as to why the service let even exists. One speculative reason is that the rule is in place because the server already has too much of an advantage with two opportunities at first strike of the ball. This brings us to the obvious question as to why the server is granted two serves at all.

Additional Let Rules

In “Not Quite Ready to Receive” it was discussed that if the receiver is not ready then the serve cannot be called a fault. I missed the subtlety of the usage of the word fault in that coverage of the rule. It was clear that the serve cannot be counted against the receiver if the receiver is not ready. The nuance is that the serve cannot be counted against the server either if it does not fall in.

The Let During a Serve

The word let, when used as a noun, is literally defined as “something that impedes: obstruction.” The idiom “without let or hindrance” is commonly used in British law to mean “without being interfered with.” With those two sentences this project has now covered the full spectrum of possible content gravitas, ranging from language arts on one end to funny YouTube videos on the other.