Latest Posts

Tennis Beyond the Headlines: December 23, 2024 The Definitive Captains Guide to USTA League Player Descriptions The Definitive Players Guide to USTA League Team Descriptions Shameless Strategies: Never Pick Up Your Share of Drill Balls Again Tennis Players as Works of Art Which Team is Your Main Squeeze? Cowtown Edition Speed Through / Double Back

As I work through the rules of tennis, I have discovered that there are three basic categories of rules. There are some rules that are patently and obviously needed. Other rules are not as immediately obvious, but the need becomes clear after considering various scenarios. The third category are rules that don’t seem to have any practical reason to exist. This brings us to to the penultimate rule in the main body of “Player Loses Point.”

The point is lost if:

k. The player deliberately and materially changes the shape of the racket when the ball is in play.

USTA Friend at Court, ITF Rules of Tennis, Section 24

I can think of no practical scenario relating to this rule. I can imagine some “Looney Tune” scenarios where the player whips out some telescoping attachments to lengthen the racquet mid point as an alternative to touching a ball that was just out of reach.

In order to materially change the shape of the racquet, I would think that it would have to be some kind of technology that was build directly into the frame. As previously discussed in a series of posts in and around “The Tradition of Racquet Conformance,” there are already extensive rules in place on the specifications and legality of the tennis racquet. Racquets that could materially change shape due to technology would simply be banned in other sections of the rules.

I am at a loss as to what a player could do to change the shape of a racquet in a useful way.

  1. United States Tennis Association (2020) Friend at Court. White Plains, NY

3 thoughts on “Racquet Shape Shifting

  1. Teresa says:

    I think the operational word in the discussion is “practical.” It is hard for me to imaging a scenario where this would be an advantage to the player with the smashed racquet.

    There was an occasion where I hit a practice serve that was framed on the return by “Fiend Spousal Unit. ” The impact actually cracked the racquet. In that case a point could have continued because he did not deliberately frame the ball which caused the modification.

    A month from now the fiend spousal unit may get around to reading this post and comment on it…

    1. Summer Richbourg says:

      I have snapped the strings of my racquet during a match and continued playing. Does that count?

  2. Steve McGinnis says:

    You smash your racquet and continue playing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *