One Racquet at a Time, No Batteries Required
After railing on the ITF for excessive wordiness in the racquet specifications, I am immediately confronted with a one word answer to a case ruling. Well played, ITF. Well played.
The Racquet as a Weapon
I am relieved to discover that there is nothing specifically in the rules prohibiting one from using the tennis racquet in order to liberate a burger.
All Strung Out
An ITF Case ruling indicates that if a player accidentally breaks a string that he can continue to play with the racquet unless doing so was specifically prohibited by event organizers. This begs the obvious question why does it have to be accidentally?
The Anatomy of the Racquet
The fact that the Friend at Court actually attempts to constrain the hitting surface of the racquet falls in the “isn’t that cute” department for me.
Racquet Metrics
How the racquet might be a tiny ITF rebellion against one of the stipulations imposed when they assumed stewardship of “The Rules of Tennis.”
Making a Racket about the Racquet
I don’t want to admit that I am a pretentious tennis snob, but comes down to using “racquet” or the “racket” spelling, then there is really no contest. Sometimes you just have to be who you are.
Material Changes to the Ball
Today we come to the first of two places in the Friend at Court where material changes to the ball are covered. May a player cause a ball to become wet by using the ball to wipe perspiration from the player’s body?
Ball Markings and Stamps
Exploring the question of why red seems to be associated with regular duty or clay courts eventually leads to Penn.
2 responsesHow to Handle Busted Balls
Today I am exploring the possibility that I may have possibly once won a point due to a faulty rules interpretation from a USTA official.
2 responses